6 Comments
Jun 20Liked by Darrell O. Ricke, M.S., Ph.D.

Thanks very much for the mention

Expand full comment
author

My direct mentions of you are well deserved.

Expand full comment

Um. I would label this article ‘Pseudoscience commentary accidentally admits jabs cause autism’.

What about the fact that the rate of incidence has gone from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 32?

Skip over that one did ya? F me.

Where the F is the epidemic coming from?

What about the ‘it is estimated that only 1% of events are reported’? And the fact that many practitioners were blocked from reporting?

If your numbers are correct, you just proved there is a correlation.

Expand full comment
author

The point is there is solid evidence of correlations for multiple vaccines (not just MMR - which has the strongest safety signal). Suppression of reports is evident in the yearly differences that I've previously posted on.

This data is based on reported cases divided by total reports of all adverse events for each vaccine. This yields minimum population estimates (called population sampling).

Expand full comment

We need to see ASD charts for vaxxed and unvaxxed - thats the only way to figure this out. Given how low a risk Mumps,. Measles, and Rubella represent, it would be reasonable to ask for the data from ten million children from each cohort.

Expand full comment
author

See: https://accscience.com/journal/AN/articles/online_first/1288 - the data in VAERS point to multiple vaccines associated with ASD. This was a request summary for young infants. If you add up across the CDC recommend vaccines for VAERS age 1 and 2 year olds, the data can account for the yearly population rate! The yearly data and data from different manufacturers making the same and overlapping vaccines points towards endotoxin contaminants as a likely cause.

Expand full comment